Automation mentoring so your team learns to do it themselves.

A program designed around the routines your team already runs, for a private cohort. The goal isn’t to deliver content: it’s for the team to build automations, put them into production and keep them running without depending on a vendor.

  • A cohort made up only of people from your company
  • Work on the real processes of your operations
  • What the cohort builds stays up and running
Mentoring · your company’s cohortPrivate cohort
  1. Spot what’s worth automatingMap of the team’s processesUp next
  2. Build it and put it liveWhatsApp order entered in the ERPUp next
  3. Handle the exceptionAlert when an order arrives incompleteUp next
  4. Keep it running when it breaksFix made by the team, no outside helpUp next

Everything the cohort builds keeps running in the operation. It’s not a course exercise.

Illustrative example

How it works

The program takes shape after we understand your operations.

There’s no fixed curriculum applied the same way at every company. The design comes from what your team does today, the tools it already has and what the operation needs it to handle on its own.

  1. 1Online

    Scoping call

    An online meeting to map who’s on the team, what routines they run, which systems they use and where the operation struggles most. We also look at what has already been tried: an attempt that didn’t take off says a lot about a team.

    You getA picture of the team and the operation.

  2. 2Tailored

    Custom design

    We put the program together: which capabilities to develop, in what order and on which real processes. The pace follows what the operation can handle; forcing intensive training on a team that’s already stretched thin only leads to dropouts.

    You getYour cohort’s program.

  3. 3Hands-on

    Private cohort, real work

    It runs only with people from your company, on processes chosen together. What the team builds isn’t a throwaway exercise: it stays running in the operation.

    You getThe team’s automations in production.

What changes in the team

Capabilities, not a certificate.

What matters is what the team can do the following Monday. These are the capabilities the program aims for; the weight of each one depends on the design.

01

Seeing what’s worth automating

Telling a process that pays off from one that only looks like it does, before building anything. It’s the capability that prevents the most expensive mistake: automating the wrong process well.

  • Reading volume, repetition and the cost of errors
  • Recognizing when the answer is not to automate
02

Building and going live

Going from design to something that actually runs, with error handling and a record of what happened. This is where the difference lies between a demo automation and one that holds up day to day.

  • Integrating the systems the company already uses
  • Handling the exception, not just the happy path
03

Maintaining it when it breaks

Every automation breaks at some point: a system changes, a field disappears, volume doubles. Autonomy means the team figuring out what happened and fixing it without calling in anyone from outside.

  • Diagnosing the failure from the logs
  • Documenting in a way a colleague can follow
Who it’s for

Training solves one kind of problem.

Mentoring is an investment of the team’s time, the scarcest resource in most operations. It’s worth knowing in advance whether your case is one where it pays off.

It makes sense when

  • The demand is recurring, not one-offThere’s a steady stream of small automations, and hiring a vendor for each one gets expensive and slow. In-house autonomy pays for itself in speed of response.
  • Someone is already trying on their ownAlmost every company has that person who has already built an automation on their own. They’re usually the best starting point: what’s missing is method and backing, not willingness.

It doesn’t make sense when

  • You need the result yesterdayTraining takes time. With a tight deadline and a process holding up the operation right now, hiring someone to implement it is the answer; mentoring can come later.
  • It’s not yet clear what to prioritizeWithout knowing which processes are worth the effort, the team learns without direction. Start with Discovery.
Real results

A team that learned how to do it.

Autonomya team automating without outside help
“The team came out of the mentoring automating processes in-house. Today we no longer depend on outside help for n8n.”
MCMarcos ConsVotorantim
Other paths

If mentoring isn’t the right fit, here’s where to go.

You need to decide what to do

When nobody knows where to start, Discovery maps, prioritizes and delivers the plan with a proposal.

See Discovery

You need the result now

With a defined process and a short deadline, implementation starts right away, with a fixed proposal.

See process automation

The problem is customer service

A high volume of customer conversations is best handled by an agent answering with context, 24 hours a day.

See AI agents
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about mentoring.

Why doesn’t the program have a set curriculum?

Because a team trained on generic examples goes back to work and can’t apply what it learned. What changes the outcome is using the routines, systems and data the team already works with: the exercise becomes real work, and what comes out of it stays in production.

What kind of person gets the most out of it?

People who know the process from the inside and have an appetite for getting hands-on with tools: operations analysts, data people, IT staff who already support the department. You don’t need to be a developer. It’s much easier to teach automation to someone who knows the process inside out than the other way around.

Does it work for a non-technical team?

It does, with a different focus: the program targets what can be built and maintained without code, and the line where technical support is needed is made explicit from the start. We don’t promise that any team can take on any automation.

How do you measure whether the team has become self-sufficient?

By what the team keeps running on its own afterward. The practical test is the team building a new automation from scratch, putting it into production and fixing it when it breaks, without calling us. Until that happens, the program isn’t over.

Is the cohort just for our company?

Yes, it’s always private. That’s what lets us work with real processes, data and systems, things no one discusses in a room full of competitors. It also avoids the problem with open classes, where half the content doesn’t apply to the participants’ context.

When the program ends, are we on our own?

That’s exactly the goal. The wrap-up is planned from the start: documentation written by the team itself and automations running in production, maintained by them. What usually continues is a channel for occasional questions and for reviewing bigger decisions.

Stop depending on vendors.

Start with the scoping call. That’s where the program design comes from, and it’s where we tell you whether training your team is really the best path for where you are right now.